Juri Savin
12-14-2004, 07:09 AM
Hello!
I have used PhpDig since version 1.6.x, and everything was OK. But ones upon a time I added new .php file and got the problem. And now I have no ideas how it can be solved.
My situation. File named import.php represents a catalogue of special equipment. There are lot of web pages based upon import.php with URLs like import.php?id=XXX. All these links are visible in the HTML output of import.php with any id. But the links are visible to human's eyes, not for spider. :)
Code of the links looks like <a href="/catalogue/import.php?id=1062">. Another script with same ideology was indexed successfully. This one -- wasn't.
I upgraded the version of PhpDig up to 1.8.4. No result.
Ok. I turned on Apache mod_rewrite module and changed my script import.php into a virtual directory /catalogue/import/ with URLs like <a href="/catalogue/import/?id=1062">. Same result.
I read just everithing on the phorum about "can't index" problem. Tried different solutions. Read documentation too. :) Same result.
Could somebody help? :rolleyes:
I have used PhpDig since version 1.6.x, and everything was OK. But ones upon a time I added new .php file and got the problem. And now I have no ideas how it can be solved.
My situation. File named import.php represents a catalogue of special equipment. There are lot of web pages based upon import.php with URLs like import.php?id=XXX. All these links are visible in the HTML output of import.php with any id. But the links are visible to human's eyes, not for spider. :)
Code of the links looks like <a href="/catalogue/import.php?id=1062">. Another script with same ideology was indexed successfully. This one -- wasn't.
I upgraded the version of PhpDig up to 1.8.4. No result.
Ok. I turned on Apache mod_rewrite module and changed my script import.php into a virtual directory /catalogue/import/ with URLs like <a href="/catalogue/import/?id=1062">. Same result.
I read just everithing on the phorum about "can't index" problem. Tried different solutions. Read documentation too. :) Same result.
Could somebody help? :rolleyes: